基于FSA方法的秦皇岛港通航环境评估

文中通过FSA方法,分析构成海事事故的危险因素,提出实际有效的风险控制措施,基于有效性和经济性评估风险控制方案,从而得到最后的选择结果,完成本次基于FSA的秦皇岛港通航安全的研究。     

基于FSA理论的港口水域通航安全研究

综合安全评估(FSA)是一种结构化和系统性的分析方法。为确保港口水域通航安全,采用了该评估。综合地考虑影响安全的诸方面因素,通过对系统存在的风险进行综合性的评估,提出合理全面并能有效地控制风险发生、减少损失的措施。把综合安全评估(FSA)法的流程应用于港口水域通航安全评估中,为研究港口水域船舶通航安全提供一条新的途径。     

综合安全评估(FSA)及其在船舶安全中的应用

综合安全评估(FSA)是近年来国外已在应用的一种安全评估方法。通过规范化的评估步骤，提出合理的并能有效控制风险的建议与措施，从而改进安全工作和提高安全水平。国际海事组织为确保船舶设计建造、营运管理和海上航行与环境等方面的安全，在20世纪末已将FSA引入和应用于船舶安全的领域。我们在介绍FSA方法及其实施的基础上，就FSA在船舶安全中应用的现状和发展进行论述，并提出了一些设想与建议。     

船舶机舱综合安全评估模式探讨

船舶机舱综合安全评估(FSA)是通过规范化的评估步骤,提出合理的并能有效控制风险的建议与措施,从而改进船舶运行的安全水平。在对FSA要素的全面分析以及社会调研的基础上,提出评估指标的建立、权重系数的计算、评估模型选择等问题的解决新模式,并讨论了这一模式在船舶机舱设备安全评估中的应用与实现过程。最后基于FSA模型得到一种机舱安全等级划分的方法。     

规范化安全评估(FSA)及其在预防船舶事故中的应用

国际海事组织为确保船舶设计建造、营运管理和海上航行与环境等方面的安全,在上世纪末已将规范化安全评估(FSA)引入和应用于船舶安全的领域.这种安全评估方法能通过规范化评估步骤,在全面系统的危险识别与风险评估的基础上,提出有效控制风险的建议与措施,从而改进安全工作和提高安全水平.此文在简要介绍FSA方法的基础上,就FSA在预防船舶事故中的应用提出了一些设想与建议.     

基于综合安全评估(FSA)的大型舰船修理风险评估研究

大型舰船修理是一项复杂的系统工程,与民用船舶相比,大型舰船的修理除了恢复动力系统和船体修复以外,更为复杂的是对各类设备和武器系统的修复,涉及众多修理厂家配合、修理资料搜集、备品备件筹措、不同部门协调等诸多因素,这些因素对舰船的修理质量都会带来潜在的风险,国外甚至出现潜艇修后比修前噪声更大的情况。综合安全评估(FSA)是一种用于制定合理的规则和提供可能的风险控制方案的综合性评价工具,当以修理质量影响因素作为风险控制的主要因素时,可以运用FSA方法对修理总体方案进行风险分析,从源头上实现对舰船修理风险的有效控制。     

FSA在引航风险控制中的应用

船舶引航是一项高风险的工作。由于船舶建造技术的进步与航运业发展的需求,船舶日趋大型化与高速化,港口交通密度不断增大,这些因素都导致了引航工作风险增加。从实际引航案例入手,根据FSA的方法和步骤,即危险源识别、风险分析、控制风险的备选方案、费用与效益评估、提供决策建议,总结如何进行风险控制和选择最佳引航方案。     

规范化安全评估(FSA)在上海港船舶引航安全工作中的应用

规范化安全评估(FormalSafetyAssessment,简称FSA)是一种先进的结构化和系统性的综合安全评估方法,近年来在国外一些发达的海运国家得到了积极地推广和应用。简要介绍"FSA在上海港船舶引航安全工作中的应用"的研究情况,并根据研究的结果就改进和完善上海港船舶安全引航工作提出了一些相应的风险控制方案和决策性建议。     

综合安全评估（FSA）方法在海事风险控制中的应用

综合安全评估（FSA）是从国际海事组织制定相关规则新形势着手，剖析FSA评价方法的技术特征，以及在国际及我国海事机构的运用情况，提出调整立法并创新管理的紧迫性和必要性，进一步阐述应用综合评价方法的具体措施，并以浙江海事局危险源标识为例，对该方法在提升海事风险控制实际运用过程中尚存在的问题和未来发展前景进行了探讨。     

关于FSA在船舶引航风险评估中的应用探讨

通过将FSA和船舶引航风险评估作为主要研究对象,通过重点分析研究船舶引航风险评估当中FSA的实际应用,在结合船舶引航作业的实际特点以及相关数据,提出通过对衡准船舶引航风险因素,在船舶引航事故中存在的引航风险基础上建立起相应的风险矩阵并衡准风险,从而有效验证FSA对于精准评估船舶引航风险具有极高的应用价值。     

综合安全评价在船舶动力装置中的应用

综合安全评价（FSA）是一种在工程技术与工程运行管理中用于制定合理可行的规则和提供风险控制的综合性、结构化和系统性的分析方法，将FSA引入到船舶动力装置的安全评价中，是对船舶安全评价的一次尝试，按照综合安全评价的五个步骤对影响船舶动力装置安全的因素进行了分析评价。具体应用时，使用故障树分析法以拉缸故障为实例做了定性和定量分析，根据评价结果提出了相应的安全管理措施，为船舶轮机人员及管理人员提供参考。     

Environmental risk evaluation criteria

This paper describes an approach to incorporating environmental risk evaluation criteria within IMO’s guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA). Such criteria are currently absent from FSA, and the discussion to include them has just started. Said criteria are relevant for evaluating on a cost-benefit basis Risk Control Options (RCOs) for reducing oil spill pollution risk. Oil pollution may comefrom any ship, including bunker spills from non-tank vessels. RCOs are not necessarily ship-based, and may include vessel traffic management information systems (VTMIS) and other options. The proposed approach may be useful in extending FSA to cover environmental risk evaluation criteria and combines such criteria with criteria already in use in FSA. It can also readily be extended to environmental consequences other than oil pollution. Recent IMO developments on this matter are also reported.     

Methods for probabilistic safety assessments of ships

 At the 62nd MSC conference (MSC62) in 1993, the UK proposed a new methodology for the consideration of safety regulations. This method is called formal safety assessment (FSA). FSA is an application of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA). Risk is used as an index of safety. One of the most important parts of FSA is to evaluate the risk to a ship when it is equipped with the safety measures recommended by the proposed safety regulations. The National Maritime Research Institute (NMRI, formerly the Ship Research Institute) has been developing a method which allows the risk to be obtained holistically by utilizing a scientific method. To obtain the risk, the probability and consequences of every accident must be evaluated. This paper examines the following points: (a) a holistic methodology for risk evaluation; (b) a method used in the process of estimating the probability of collision; (c) a method to reduce the numbers of fire escalation scenarios; (d) a trial risk evaluation of cabin fire. Received: January 10, 2002 / Accepted: April 18, 2002     

综合安全评估方法应用

基于船用核动力装置(MNPP)安全性的特点,阐述了综合安全评估(FSA)的概念和应用框架,具体分析FSA在船用核动力装置安全评估方面的应用,指出具体应用FSA对船用核动力装置进行安全评估存在的不足。     

综合安全评估中人的可靠性分析

首先对综合安全评估的基本概念及应用范围进行了阐述,然后介绍了第一代、第二代人的可靠性分析方法的基本原理及其中有代表性的几种分析方法,最后,应用综合安全评估的原理对海事领域人的可靠性分析方法进行了研究,并提出了该领域人的可靠性分析存在的问题。     

A trial application of FSA methodology to the hatchway watertight integrity of bulk carriers

Formal safety assessment (FSA) is a formal, structured and systematic methodology, aimed at enhancing maritime safety, including protection of life, property and marine environment, by using risk and cost–benefit assessments. For the application of this methodology to the rule-making process, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) presented the Interim Guidelines, which describe procedures of FSA and inputs/outputs of each procedure in detail. This paper basically deals with an application of FSA methodology according to the IMO's Interim Guidelines to the hatchway watertight integrity of bulk carriers, which was carried out as a cooperative research between Korean Register of Shipping and Seoul National University. As results of this application study, 18 hazards are identified and 32 risk control measures are devised to reduce the associated risks. Potential risks, costs and benefits when some Risk Control Options are introduced are evaluated in monetary unit of US $. Finally, some discussions and recommendations based on experiences are also given for both future work and better application of this FSA methodology to the rule-making process.     

Formal Safety Assessment: an updated review

The method of Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) was devised several years ago with the intent to help the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and other policy makers formulate policies and regulations by the proper use of the scientific method in matters pertaining to maritime safety and the protection of the marine environment. A host of FSA studies have been submitted over the last several years and have been reviewed by the IMO. Also, progress has been recently accomplished as regards incorporating environmental risk evaluation criteria within FSA. On the basis of these developments, revisions of the FSA guidelines have been proposed and adopted. This paper presents a review of the FSA method in light of these developments. This review updates an earlier review of FSA by Kontovas and Psaraftis [Marine Technol 46(1):45?C59, (2009)]. It also takes this opportunity to identify some deficiencies of FSA, either due to an incorrect application of the method or to the method itself, and makes some suggestions for further action in this area.