共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 613 毫秒
1.
针对超大型集装箱船结构布置进行多方案设计对比分析.以某万箱船为例,对比了8种不同结构布置方案,确定了货舱区结构设计、横舱壁支撑系统、设计静水弯矩、纵骨型材选择以及货舱内装载高箱对结构性能的影响.该研究对超大型集装箱船结构优化设计有一定的参考意义. 相似文献
2.
随着超大型集装箱船船宽的增大,其底部板架横向应力日趋受到关注。文章以集装箱船货舱区船底板架为研究对象,基于舱段数值仿真方法,考虑多种横向不对称装载型式、装载工况和动载荷工况,分析集装箱船底部板架的应力响应特点,讨论横向不对称装载型式对船底板架局部强度和应力分布的影响规律,并基于不同类型动载荷工况初步探讨其对横向不对称装载下的船底板架影响。研究结果表明,横向不对称装载下高应力点分布具有相似性,应力水平较原对称装载升高,校核集装箱船强度中建议考虑实际可能的横向不对称装载型式的影响。 相似文献
3.
4.
文章主要对超大型集装箱船优化改型两个方案的伴流场进行模型试验的对比分析,对改进超大型集装箱船伴流场的问题作了介绍。 相似文献
5.
分析了集装箱船舶大型化发展趋势,以及集装箱运输链的各环节因素对开发超大型集装箱船的影响;设计上重点对超大型集装箱船推进的各种备选方案进行了分析论述。 相似文献
6.
分析了集装箱船舶大型化发展趋势,以及集装箱运输链的各环节因素对开发超大型集装箱船的影响;设计上重点对超大型集装箱船推进的各种备选方案进行了分析论述。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
随着集装箱船的大型化和超大型化,对超大型集装箱船的设计和安全管理上发生了较大变化,本文针对超大型集装箱船所呈现的特点,结合以往的管理实践,从超大型船舶发生的事故、船舶特点、操纵特性、设备的操作和人员配置进行了分析和阐述,为超大型集装箱船的安全管理提供参考。 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
水面舰艇综合电力系统的技术进展 总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7
概述了水面舰艇综合电力系统的技术进展,包括燃气轮机发电机组技术、推进电机技术、电力电子变换器技术和区域配电系统技术的发展现状. 相似文献
14.
针对自动化集装箱码头AGV(自动导引运输车)动力系统及电池充电方式选型的问题,采集了柴油内燃机、铅酸电池及3种锂电池的应用性能数据,对比分析研究得出锂电池动力方式在新一代自动化码头水平运输系统的应用优势。针对我国已经投产应用的集装箱AGV换电池充电方案、机会充电方案、浅充浅放式循环充电方案,从建设成本、作业效率、安全性能到绿色港口建设方面进行对比研究。提出浅充浅放式循环充电方案的应用优势与经济效益,为其他自动化集装箱码头水平运输系统的设计选型提供参考。 相似文献
15.
IMO第二代完整稳性衡准对现有万箱船设计的影响 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
国际海事组织(IMO)正在制定基于水动力学的第二代完整稳性衡准,新衡准的实施必然对现有船舶的设计带来巨大影响。集装箱船大型化是航运界的发展趋势,万箱船船型订单近年也大幅上升。已有的事故发现大型集装箱船对参数横摇、过度加速度等衡准相对敏感,但现有船舶的设计对此类事故模式考虑较少,因此有必要开展相关研究。本文选取了某万箱集装箱船,对其大量装载工况进行四种稳性失效模式的计算分析,研究了第二代完整稳性的实施对大型集装箱船的稳性影响,并对其装载、设计等提出一定的建议。 相似文献
16.
超大型船舶的发展日趋迅猛,这对航海者来说不仅要求更高,操船技术难度也更大,我们有必要不断总结经验,掌握客观规律,提高操作技能,从而更好更安全地驾驶超大型船舶。 相似文献
17.
为提升江苏内河集装箱运输船舶标准化水平,实现船型与船闸、航道等通航基础设施发展相匹配,通过梳理内河标准船型主尺度标准和通航管理规定的修订情况,结合京杭运河江苏段集装箱营运船舶的调研,在船舶主尺度、舱室布置、船体结构和新能源动力的应用等方面分析江苏内河集装箱船标准船型的设计要点,完成48 TEU、64 TEU和96 TEU标准集装箱船设计。虽然受限于内河航运关注船舶成本的现状,标准集装箱船的设计更多采用传统基础船型设计思路,但研发运用先进技术、满足内河EEDI的绿色节能型船舶是标准船型的重要发展方向。 相似文献
18.
Edwin Van Hassel Hilde Meersman Eddy Van de Voorde Thierry Vanelslander 《Maritime Policy and Management》2013,40(2):192-208
In recent years, an increase in the size of the container ships could be observed. The question is how these larger ships will influence the total generalised costs from a port of loading to a destination in the European hinterland. The second question is whether a scale increase of the container ships on other loops, such as a loop from the United States to Europe, has the same impact on the generalised chain costs as on the loop from Asia to Europe. A derived question is which element of the total chain has the highest importance, and whether this balance varies as the ship size changes. In this article, a model is developed that allows answering the above research questions. The model is designed to simulate the cost of a complete loop of a container ship and of a chain that uses that same loop. For the chain cost simulation, the maritime part is determined by the loop. From the ports of loading and unloading, the port container handling and the hinterland transportation costs are also integrated. The model also allows calculating the total chain cost from a point of origin (either a hinterland region or a port) to a destination point (also a port or a hinterland region). An actual container loop of a container shipping company can be introduced in the model. An application is made to two existing container loops, namely from Asia respectively the United States to Europe. It turns out that changing ship does indeed lead to economies of scale, but also that the impact is larger on the Asia–Europe connection than on the US–Europe connection. Furthermore, the maritime component has the biggest share in the total chain cost, but as ship size increases, the shares start getting closer to each other. This research contributes to the existing literature in two ways. First of all, it quantifies the impact of the scale increase of container ships throughout the total chain. Second, this is done from a bottom-up engineering modelling approach. 相似文献
19.
20.
The planning, design and development of a container terminal with optimum size and capacity and with a minimum capital cost
is fundamentally dependent upon the loading and discharging operations at the quayside. The quayside function of container
terminals is dependent basically on the number of berths available to service the incoming container ships. The objective
of the container terminals dealing and admitting the ongoing ship calls is to provide immediate berth and loading and discharging
services to the container ships with a minimum costly waiting time and a maximum efficiency. Previously terminal planners
used to build extra berths to provide service. During the last two decades the terminal operators have adopted automation
technologies in loading and discharging operation of the container ships as an alternative to designing extra berths. Ship
owners naturally expect least waiting times for their container ships. On the other hand, it is also natural for port operators
in a container terminal with costly facilities to see a high berth occupancy and productivity at the quayside. This study
uses queuing theory to find a break-even point as a way of evaluating the cost of container ship waiting times and the cost
of berth unproductive service times for container terminals aiming to automate their quayside operation. The analysis illustrates
that automation devices installed on conventional Quayside Cranes (QSCs) significantly reduce the turnaround time of the container
ships calling at the ports. It argues, however, that there should be a balance between the cost of berth unproductive service
times and the cost of vessel waiting times. The study introduces a break-even point to be considered as a benchmark for calculating
such a balance. The analysis in this study can be used as a decision tool for the operators of container terminals in the
medium to small ports to appraise the feasibility of an investment in automation or expansion of the quayside facilities. 相似文献