共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 104 毫秒
1.
建立了被撞大客车车身骨架、撞击大客车车身骨架和撞击货车有限元模型,运用ANSYS/LS—DYNA软件,分别模拟了撞击大客车与被撞大客车和撞击货车与被撞大客车侧面碰撞.并从侧面碰撞位置、骨架结构变形、乘员生存空间、碰撞速度和加速度方面分析了被撞大客车侧面碰撞安全性。 相似文献
2.
在ANSYS/LS-DYNA中建立了大客车车身骨架正面碰撞有限元计算模型,并在普通计算机上完成了整车与刚性壁的碰撞仿真计算,从结构变形、乘员生存空间和碰撞加速度三个方面分析了车身骨架的耐撞性问题,讨论了改进方法和措施。 相似文献
3.
4.
以某型承载式大客车为研究对象,利用有限元法和非线性理论建立整车有限元模型,通过通用显式动力分析软件对其100%正面碰撞进行仿真计算,研究该承载式车身骨架结构的变形大小以及变形特点,并对乘员的生存空间进行分析比较,评价该客车耐撞性与安全性能,并为进一步研究改进客车耐撞性能提供相关参考。 相似文献
5.
6.
为了改善大客车框架的耐撞性,改进了车身前框架结构,建立了仿真的有限元汽车模型,进行了数值仿真实验。针对国内在产的某型号客车,参照欧洲经济委员会ECE—R29法规的摆锤撞击试验,利用软件LS—DYNA计算了客车框架在前碰撞中的位移和加速度。对客车骨架不同材料和厚度进行正交实验,优化车身结构耐撞性能。结果表明:采用改进方案... 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Buses are an integral part of the national transportation system of each country. A rollover event is one of the most important
hazards that concerns the safety of the passengers and the crew in a bus. In the past, it was observed after the accident
that the deforming superstructure seriously threatens the lives of the passengers. Thus, the stiffness of the bus frame is
the first thing that needs to be considered. The unfortunate side of strengthening the bus superstructure is that it usually
causes the bus weight to increase. This paper presents an efficient and robust analysis method with which to design the bus
superstructure for a reduction in occupant injuries from rollover accidents while the weight of the strengthened bus is maintained
at the same level. First, the absorbed energy of the bus frame and its components during a rollover were investigated by using
a LS-DYNA numerical study. The highest energy absorption region, which is the side section of the bus frame, was found and
focused on for the investigation of a means to re-distribute the energy-absorption ability of the side frame component. Then
the thickness parameters that were obtained from the re-distribution of the energy-absorption ability were used in the analysis
to optimize the design. Finally, a prototype of the bus with a reasonable thickness for the window pillars and the side wall
bars, which was based on the optimized parameters, was verified to ensure it satisfied ECE R66. In this paper, an effective
usage of materials and an efficient and robust analysis method were presented to design the bus superstructure. Although the
optimization process for increasing the stiffness is simple, this study improves the upper displacement by 39.9% and the lower
displacement by 49.3% (versus the bus survivor space) while maintaining the bus weight at the existing level. 相似文献
15.
通过分析高速公路平纵线形指标与事故率的关系,引入线形影响因子,提出了基于线形影响因子的高速公路基本路段安全评价方法。首先,应用回归分析的方法,确定了平曲线半径、平曲线偏角、直线段长度、竖曲线半径及纵坡坡度与事故率的关系,在此基础上分析了弯坡组合、平竖曲线组合以及长大坡组合路段上的事故率。进而,结合事故率与线形的关系,以线形影响因子表征几何线形指标对高速公路事故率的影响,据此评价高速公路的行车安全性。案例分析结果表明,基于线形影响因子确定的危险路段与由实际事故率确定的危险路段具有极高的一致性,达到了81%。 相似文献
16.
为了探讨不同类型偏置碰撞下驾驶员腿部伤害的差异性,本文在对C-NCAP40%偏置碰撞及IIHS 25%小偏置碰撞两种不同类型偏置碰撞试验的试验工况、假人腿部评价指标进行介绍的基础上,对某乘用车车型在上述两种试验下驾驶员的腿部伤害指标进行了对比研究,并从碰撞力的传递路径对其结果进行了分析。结果表明:由于碰撞中车身与壁障重叠率的不同导致不同的碰撞力传递路径,最终导致车身变形的差异。其中,25%小偏置碰撞对车身的破坏程度极大,试验后驾驶员侧的A柱严重变形,车身结构大量侵入到车内生存空间,故其假人腿部伤害值大于另外两种正面碰撞,尤其是驾驶员左腿伤害值。优化车身前端结构,增加A柱强度,最大程度保证驾驶舱腿部生存空间,才能有效提高小偏置碰撞中乘员的安全性能。 相似文献
17.
采用有限元方法分析了七座小客车碰撞安全的特性,通过特殊焊接形式和约束的施加,建立了与实车相一致的悬架和轮胎模型。整车运用施加质量点等方法,有效地保证了整车模拟碰撞过程的准确性,并成功地完成了与实验结果的对标分析。 相似文献
18.
Bus right hook (BRH) crashes at intersections are one of the most common types of crashes for bus carriers, which accounted for as high as 16% of fatal and injury crashes involving large buses at intersections in Taiwan. A BRH crash occurs when a bus and another vehicle traveling in the same direction head into an intersection, but the bus driver makes a right turn across the path of the through-moving vehicle, and both vehicles collide. This study responds to the research needs to identity factors associated with BRH crashes by utilizing in-vehicle data recorder (IVDR) data. A four step analysis procedure was developed, including (1) video data coding, (2) crash sequence analysis to identify crash contributing factors, (3) a case-control study to examine the relationship between the crash contributing factors and crash occurrence, and (4) modeling crash risk in terms of the crash contributing factors to better understand the crash generating process. This study first identified the existence of driver unattended time as the time between when the driver last checked the right back mirror to finally steering for a right turn, indicating the time period wherein the driver did not track the through vehicle on the right side using the right back mirror. It was found that BRH crashes could be attributed to the concurrence of unattended time and the speed difference between the bus and through vehicle. Several recommendations are discussed based on the results to further develop countermeasures to reduce this type of crash. 相似文献