英标及PIANC规范船舶撞击能量计算比较

对比了英标和PIANC两本规范关于船舶撞击能量计算的异同,并就护舷设计吸收能与中国规范进行了比较分析,就撞击能计算中的偏心系数开展了进一步研究。得出结论:1)英标及PIANC规范船舶撞击能量计算中偏心系数、水动力质量系数和异常靠泊能量系数等参数取值不同。2)英标的集装箱船撞击能设计值大多小于PIANC,而油船撞击能设计值大于PIANC。3)油船采用三分点靠泊时撞击能量约为四分点靠泊时的1. 3倍左右。4)油船及气体运输船管汇偏中影响着偏心系数C_E取值,随着船舶吨级增大而减小,影响程度为12%～29%。     

中英码头船舶靠泊撞击能设计规范对比分析

对比分析了中、英规范关于码头船舶靠泊撞击能设计方面的差异,并通过实例进行了验算。研究结果表明:中国水运行业规范对影响船舶靠泊撞击能的因素考虑不全,计算结果偏小,动能系数取值不尽合理。建议修订计算公式中系数的种类和取值。同时,为海外项目船舶靠泊撞击能设计提供理论参考。     

系泊船舶在横浪作用下撞击能量计算参数Cm 取值研究

船舶附加水体质量系数Cm的取值对计算系泊船舶在横浪作用下的撞击能量具有十分重要的影响,目前国内外相关文献对该参数取值差异较大,且国内水运行业规范的参数取值偏小,给结构安全带来一定隐患。经过对取值规定的比较,并参照计算公式、结合工程实例分析计算结果,得知国内现行规范Cm的取值明显小于国内外相关规范和研究报告的取值。建议20万吨级以上船舶增大Cm取值为1.7～2.0。     

多护舷分配的船舶撞击能计算和护舷选型

国内外规范和标准均未明确船舶有效撞击能量在护舷中如何分配,通常考虑由单个护舷完全吸收。以海外某重力式码头护舷选型为例,研究船舶有效撞击能量由多护舷分配的可能性,阐述基于PIANC指南的多护舷分配的有效撞击能量计算方法和护舷选型过程。研究结果表明:在护舷的破损不至于引起码头结构严重损害的前提下,基于PIANC指南的船舶有效撞击能量考虑多护舷分配是合理的。这一设计理念能够降低对单个护舷的吸能要求,降低码头结构造价,对海外码头工程的设计具有借鉴意义。     

基于PIANC的码头前沿波浪富裕深度分析

PIANC提出了从船舶等级、船舶装载度、水深、波高、浪向和航速共6个影响因素分析计算港池和航道的水域波浪富裕深度。针对码头前沿波浪富裕深度,引入了PIANC关于波浪富裕深度的计算方法。并详细分析了PIANC关于码头前沿波浪富裕深度的计算方法的适应性,简要探讨了长周期波浪引起的船舶垂直运动量。重点对PIANC计算方法进行简化,并与中国规范进行了对比分析,对PIANC计算方法简化后的码头前沿波浪富裕系数K0取值提供了建议,为工程相关设计提供参考。     

系泊船舶在波浪作用下撞击力研究

系泊船舶在波浪作用下的撞击力往往是大型开敞式码头设计的控制荷载。大型船舶采用现行规范公式计算值比模型试验值小得多,主要原因是船舶附加水体影响系数Cm值过小。建议规范修订加大经费投入,采用实测参数确定Cm值。     

波浪作用下船舶撞击力计算参数的选择

系泊船舶在波浪作用下的撞击力往往是大型开敞式码头设计的控制荷载。由于规范公式中船舶附加水体质量系数Cm和波高取值偏小导致计算值与物理模型试验值相差甚大。建议Cm取值为1．7～2．0，波高取为H1%。     

基于ABAQUS的斜桩-重力式结构靠泊撞击力

通过有限元软件ABAQUS对船舶靠泊撞击作用下的斜桩-重力式结构进行动、静力响应研究,对比结构响应的异同,得到了靠泊撞击力作用下结构的位移放大效应,并探讨不同有效撞击能量下的放大效应变化规律。研究表明,相同有效撞击能量作用下的复合结构撞击力动力放大系数也相同;在进行斜桩-重力式结构设计时,当船舶有效撞击能量大于1 350.4 k J时,靠泊撞击力分项系数按规范取1.5偏小;当设计船型为30万吨级油船时,推荐靠泊撞击力分项系数取2.12。     

美国国防部UFC规范船舶撞击能计算解析

简述美国国防部UFC规范关于船舶撞击能的计算公式,并比较其设计参数选取和计算结果与英标BSI规范和我国规范的异同,着重分析偏心系数C_e和虚拟质量系数C_m。结果表明,UFC规范在C_m中考虑了船底相对水深对船舶撞击能的影响,且此时C_m的计算结果与船模试验结果较为接近;船舶撞击能的计算结果,UFC规范>英标>我国规范;C_e、C_m在不同船型中基本为常量,不随吨级而变化。     

大型船舶靠泊能量计算

船舶靠泊有效撞击能量计算和护舷设计是码头工程设计中的重要内容.护舷设施作为码头上重要的设备之一,关系到码头工程造价和靠泊作业安全,特别是对于大型船舶在外海或开敞式水域中的靠泊作业尤显重要.结合工作实践,就大型船舶靠泊有效撞击能量计算进行探讨.     

Errata

正In the paper"Influence of Fouling Assemblage on the Corrosion Behaviour of Mild Steel in the Coastal Waters of The Gulf of Mannar,India"in Vol.12,No.4,Page:509,References were lost,and the two authors’biographies were identical.The correct text is shown below.We apologize to the authors and our readers for any inconvenience caused by the errors.     

Journal of Marine Science and Application 2014 Sum. Contents

正~~     

第34届海洋、离岸及极地工程国际会议(英文)

正St.John's,Newfoundland,Canada,May 31-June 5,2015 OMAE2015 is the ideal forum for researchers,engineers,managers,technicians and students from the scientific and industrial communities from around the world to: meet and present advances in technology and its scientific support;     

33rd International Conference on Ocean,Offshore and Arctic Engineering （OMAE2014）

正San Francisco,California,June 8-13,2014.OMAE 2014 is the ideal forum for researchers,engineers,managers,technicians and students from the scientific and industrial communities from around the world to:·meet and present advances in technology and its scientific support;·to exchange ideas and experiences whilst promoting technological progress and its application in industry·to promote international cooperation in ocean,offshore and arctic engineering.In line with the tradition of excellence of previous OMAE conferences,more than 900 technical papers are planned for presentation.Outreach for Engineers Specialty Forum This Specialty Forum is designed for students and professionals who may not be familiar with the Ocean and Offshore industry,as well as those who have just recently specialized in this field.     

联合作战计划和执行系统

全球指挥控制系统(GCCS)实施当前美国海军网络中心战信息基础设施的联合计划网络。联合作战计划和执行系统(JOPES)支持GCCS实现联合计划。JOPES有两类计划：时间不限的精密预案计划生成作战计划、方案计划或职能计划；时间敏感的危机行动计划生成作战命令或战役方案。前者在和平时期创建的作战计划是后者的计划基础，加速应付危机的能力。     

Recent progress on wave induced loading measurements in warships

Recent measurements of wave induced hull strain and flexure in RN warships are presented together with the derivation of the current design criteria for extreme hull girder bending loads. The history of the development of the shipboard instrumentation used is given and recent developments to improve the quality and ease of analysis of the data are described. An unexpectedly high transverse asymmetry in the longitudinal strains measured in destroyers is shown to be the result of a combination of vertical and lateral bending in oblique seas. Finally recent theoretical comparisons between the loading of Deep-Vee hulls and conventional UK rounded bilge hulls are presented which demonstrate the higher loading experienced by this type of hull form.     

The 11th International Conference on Hydrodynamics (ICHD 2014)

正19–24 October 2014 SingaporeCONFERENCE THEMES The overall aim of the ICHD Conference is to provide a forum for participants from around the world to review,discuss and present the latest developments in the broad discipline of hydrodynamics and fluid mechanics.The first International Conference on Hydrodynamics(ICHD)was initiated in 1994 in Wuxi,China.Since then,9 more ICHD conferences were held subsequently in Hong Kong,Seoul,Yokohama,Tainan,Perth,Ischia,Nantes,Shanghai and St Petersburg.Evidently the ICHD conference has become an important event among academics,researchers,engineers and operators,working in the fields closely related to the science and technology of hydrodynamics.The 11th ICHD will be held in Singapore in 2014.     

第十二届深水操作会议和展览会(英文)

正November 4-6,2014Moody Gardens HotelConvention Center/Galveston,TX The Deepwater Operations Conference and Exhibition is celebrating its 12th anniversary this year.This growing event will continue the tradition of excellence in addressing operational challenges involved in developing deepwater resources.We will return to the Moody Gardens Hotel and Convention Center on November 5-7,2014 in Galveston,Texas.     

Eastbound or westbound ?

In terms of equal sailing distances, where is the inflexion when ships depart from ports in the Asian Continent to New York via Suez and/or Panama？
The answer is China South Port Group （Hong Kong, Shenzhen and Guangzhou）.     

Impact of regulation on the performances of long-distance transport services: A comparison of the different approaches in Sweden and Norway

Despite the many socio-economic similarities between Sweden and Norway, differences in jurisdiction, organisation, cooperation, and financing of long-distance passenger train and coach services have led to the development of four distinctively different ways of serving the markets. This paper describes how the train and coach markets have developed in the two countries, with emphasis on regulatory and industrial structure and a couple of performance variables.Looking at passenger rail, both countries separated infrastructure from operation over a decade ago. However, while Norwegian rail is characterised by an almost monopoly supplier, rail services in Sweden are partly decentralised to the responsibility of county authorities and are widely subjected to competitive tendering. The rest of the network is about to be opened up for on-the-track competition. Swedish Rail (SJ) has spent the last decades consolidating its core business (passenger rail) and sold out its other businesses. In contrast, the Norwegian state rail (NSB) has expanded its business to become a major bus operator and property owner, with extensions also into the Swedish market.The coach industry was more recently deregulated in both countries. The Swedish coach market is dominated by privately owned companies operating services to and from Stockholm. In Norway, state-owned NSB is a major coach operator on medium distance routes, and is also the largest partner of Nor-Way Bussekspress which totally dominates long-distance coach services. Further, the Norwegian coach market is characterised by cross-ownership and cooperation which has enabled an extensive route network which covers most of Norway.We find distinct differences in achievements in the two modes and in the two countries. Swedish rail services have succeeded in winning market shares and in renewing and developing both infrastructure and service levels to a greater extent than the Norwegian model. On the other hand, the Norwegian coach market seems to be more developed and efficient compared to its Swedish counterpart.The paper concludes with a discussion on the possible links between the different approaches and the performance observed, with the aim to stimulate further and more detailed research on some important issues.